OPEN LETTER TO LETTING / ESTATE AGENTS
(copy of letter emailed today to  City Residential 31/03/2010)
Re: Car Parking at Alexandra Tower
Dear Sirs,
We would like to bring to your attention the difficulties that have  been experienced by residents of Alexandra Tower, 19 Princes Parade,  Liverpool, L3 1BF, specifically those relating to the car park attached  to the building with access via a lift system.
We believe that there is ‘material information’ enclosed in this  letter for which a statutory obligation for letting agents exists, in  respect of disclosing said ‘material information’ to prospective  tenants, enquiring about residing in Alexandra Tower.
It is noted that City Residential has been the principle agent for  this building in both the residential lettings and residential sales  capacity. However, other agents whom are acting in respect of this  building will receive the same correspondence.
Parking not fit for purpose
It is argued by a number of residents with parking spaces and many  of the Otis lift engineers whom have attended the building and effected  temporary fixes of the lift, that the lift system installed is not fit  for purpose. It has routinely been subject to long term mechanical  failures owing to poor design, ineffective materials and components  installed at the outset, and an incorrect software configuration.
Whilst, for the majority of the time, one lift does remain working,  having a single access point in itself is cause for concern, but when  combined with the faulty software the overall outcome is one of  considerable delay. Sometimes these delays can be up to 45min at peak  times to either enter or leave the car park.
At times, the failures result in a total loss of access to the car  park, thereby trapping vehicles in the building, and preventing others  accessing the car park to store their vehicles. This causes severe  disruption, not limited to, loss of earnings and additional travel  costs.
We are sure you can appreciate that over the last 18 months, with  such prevalent problems, many tenants have decided not to renew their  contract upon expiry. We are personally aware of more than a dozen such  residents in the last 3 months alone. You will likely be aware of this,  owing to some departing via your agency.
The recently formed Residents Committee has consulted with residents  and the management company in a bid to solve the parking issue for the  benefit of all concerned parties.
For your information, there is also an ongoing dispute between the  buildings management agent (Thomson and Moulton), the developers  (Millennium Estates) and their subsequent receiver (Zolphur Cooper), the  controlling bank (Barclays), the original installer of the lift  (Sheridan Lifts Limited ) and Otis, whom are currently attempting to  manage the maintenance and ongoing issues of this known problem.
With so many parties to the dispute, and the magnitude of the  problem at hand, the last 15 months have seen absolutely no progress to  put in place a suitable resolution. At the time of writing the car  parking system has seen a total outage to both lifts no less than 5  times in the last few days (3 of which alone were on the evening of  Friday 8th) and a further complete outage from approx 7am yesterday the   11th to the afternoon of that same day
However, despite this abundance of information, we feel that despite  yours, and other agent’s obligations, many residents whom have moved in  over the last 6 months have not been made aware of the ongoing issues  in the building, specifically in respect of parking. This is somewhat  troubling when it can be argued that the issues have become widespread,  well documented and well publicised by current residents and those  leaving.
We can only guess that such omissions are an oversight on your part  and that of other agents, likely as a result of office miscommunication  and we are sure you wish to address this and prevent further omissions.
Statutory Obligations
Whilst we are sure, as such a prominent entity in the Liverpool  residential market you value both residents and landlords and wish to  offer a good service, we wanted to reiterate to you and all other  agents, of your statutory obligations as we appreciate that sometimes  there maybe a communication breakdown in an office environment  preventing accurate and timely information getting to front line staff  who will be handling queries about the properties you act as agents for.
Quite often, residential letting agents do forget about their  obligations in respect of disclosures, or are perhaps not aware of them.  We are sure that any such omission of any disclosure from City  Residential if such an omission has taken place, has been, as indicated,  an oversight.
We are also making sure that residential agents are aware that in  recent years it is now also a criminal offence for an estate/letting  agent to make certain statements about a property which are false or  misleading.
Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008
The new Act, which some agents may not be aware of, prohibits  'agents' (letting or otherwise) omitting material information from  consumers, if that omission might cause the consumer to take a different  decision. (See section 6 of the Act)
Material information is defined within the act as 'information which  the average consumer needs, according to the context, to take an  informed transactional decision'.
We would argue that the mechanical failures and the subsequent  disputes between the parties mentioned earlier in failing to resolve the  matter are material enough to warrant disclosure. However, with many  residents having left (including those through your office) and more  planning to leave upon tenancy expiry, citing the parking issues as the  principle reason, that this would be further grounds for disclosure  under ‘material information’ as prescribed by the act.
The possibility of lost earnings, additional travel expenses, damage  to motor vehicles on the public highway and employment issues in  respect of lateness and/or absence as a direct consequence of the car  lift failure is also grounds for disclosure of ‘material information’ as  all of the above have been experienced by numerous residents on  numerous occasions.
The intention of this letter is to both remind all agents as to  their obligations, and ascertain whether they will be disclosing the  ‘material information’ to prospective tenants?
It must also be noted that The Health and Safety Executive are  currently investigating residents safety concerns highlighted to them on  recent admission by the management company, that a lift had been in  service for a period of time with safety issues and subsequently taken  out of service, which has remained out of service since Feb 10th this  year.
If you are in any doubt as to the veracity of this correspondence we  would encourage you to contact the buildings management agent (Thomson  and Moulton), and speak to Tudor Roberts (0151 482 2567).  He can  confirm the authenticity of the issues this letter highlights. Failure  to do so would not be considered a suitable defence to a breach of the  act as the obligation is on the agent to take all reasonable steps to  ensure compliance.
For the avoidance of doubt, we will include all residents, whether  they have parking or not, within our residents updates and/or meetings.  However, for the purpose of the ‘material information’ as prescribed by  Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, and the  intention of this letter for you to disclose such information, we do not  currently deem letting agents liable for non disclosure to potential  tenants in respect of properties without allocated parking. Furthermore,  as prescribed in the act an omission is considered to have taken place  upon your prior knowledge of material information, which you  subsequently do not pass on to the consumer, whether or not they  specifically ask for it.
Taking this point further, it would not be considered reasonable for  the consumer to question an agent as to any conceivable issue that may  or may not arise and as such, omissions in the context of the act, are  limited to known information on your behalf.
We are sure you will be aware of this, however, it maybe prudent to  make this point clear to your frontline staff.
As such, we deem this sufficient notice given to you, and other  letting agents, of the current issues effecting Alexandra Tower which  are deemed ‘material’, to enable you to comply with your statutory  duties. Whilst we do not expect any agent to defy their statutory  obligations, the Residents Committee will ensure that all new residents  to the building will be given access to our  findings/correspondence/meetings and in doing so, confirmation sought as  to whether the car parking issue was informed to them prior to signing a  tenancy agreement.
We would be grateful if you could confirm by return, your receipt of  this correspondence and your intentions in respect of disclosing the  information to potential tenants of this building.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment